Quality is sometimes misunderstood and severely, totally lost

For over twenty-five years I have been on the quality path.

The first years and first jobs naturally came with limited knowledge. That is how learning begins. But over time, quality became much more than a profession. It became a passion. Tested methods applied in practical ways can lead to real results.

What makes quality work so motivating?

Why do the problems and difficulties hook so strongly?

Because quality is about solving real challenges. It is about enabling progress and providing customers with robust solutions. I often think of quality as a scale that is never in perfect balance. It always turns either towards improvement or deterioration depending on the decisions being made.

And yes, people, you choose the direction.

Quality is about continuous improvement. Continuous improvement means change. It means finding better ways and making sustainable decisions.

However, quality is not always only about common sense.

Systematic basic work can often bring quality to a good level, but not always. There are situations where quality becomes severely misunderstood. In the worst cases the quality scale may move into serious imbalance for years or even permanently.

Where does misunderstood quality lead? The consequences are rarely small.

To unnecessary costs.

To waste work.

To lost efficiency.

To wasted resources.

To lost opportunities.

The list could be long.

How does this happen?

Waste work may be hidden instead of addressed.

Delivery pressure may override long-term thinking.

Cost cutting may be pushed so aggressively that it actually creates higher costs later.

Decisions may be based on the loudest opinion instead of data.

Organizations may operate in layers of silos without combining knowledge, efforts and targets.

During more than twenty-five years in quality I have seen all of these.

And yet the opposite is also true.

Systematic work and data driven decisions can create real cost reductions and satisfied customers who are willing to pay for robust solutions.

Which one would you choose?

And why?

There are professionals in many fields, including quality. I deeply value the experiences gained across different industries and alongside different professionals. I also value the competent trainers and colleagues who have shaped my journey. Without them the passion for quality would not still be burning.

But the best part of quality work is something else entirely. It is the opportunity to work with magnificient professionals with various fields across an organization. That competence is true additional value to customers when put together.

Quality departments do not create quality.

Organizations create quality. Competent people create quality.

That is the cherry on the cake and also what fills the whole pie.

Without people there is no quality.